| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Are Links Too Much? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I just told you that a link on a T1 BC gives 24% to tackle range! It converts your entire gang's T2 points into RF ones, at a cost of 2 mill instead of 130 mill per ship. If you think that's not a huge difference, you need to use links more! The ...
- by Gypsio III - at 2014.03.31 23:29:00
|
2. Are Links Too Much? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
No. The 2 mill one fitted on a T1 BC without a mindlink. If I played by your rules, it would be 34.5%. And the SP requirement is simply a barrier to exclude new players. If you're going to have such stupidly overpowered modules, then they need ...
- by Gypsio III - at 2014.03.31 20:58:00
|
3. Are Links Too Much? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The on/off grid thing is a smokescreen, links are hugely overpowered wherever they are. In a world where we pay around 60-100 mill for a single ship to increase its tackle range by 25-40%, the existence of a 2 mill mod that gives 24% range to ever...
- by Gypsio III - at 2014.03.31 19:37:00
|
4. Distribution of Boosts to a Fleet - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Robert Morningstar wrote: the other answer is that you mentioned the fleet commander is in a safe spot. This no longer works the only thing that will now off grid boost is a industrial command ship and that only with mining links. It is now all...
- by Gypsio III - at 2013.10.31 14:10:00
|
5. The Giant List of Fleet Comps - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Spacewangs. Jump in a Thorax hull, hit "approach" on target and overload everything.
- by Gypsio III - at 2013.10.11 12:28:00
|
6. Is there any consistent 1v1 in Eve? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
You vs. CONCORD should give pretty consistent results.
- by Gypsio III - at 2013.03.10 14:14:00
|
7. curious , worst frigate for pvp ? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Echelon? Rifter was top dog for years, and then CCP boosted it further with the 2009 ammo and AC changes. If now it's its turn to sit at the bottom for half a decade, then it deserves it.
- by Gypsio III - at 2013.01.30 12:23:00
|
8. Poseidon-style safespots: Can you still make them within system confines? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
You used to be able to add to the overview, bookmark and warp to the secondary suns in wormhole special-effect systems. Typically they'd be a few 10s of AU off in a random direction. Awesome deep safes and yeah, you could just chill at zero on a B...
- by Gypsio III - at 2012.03.28 18:30:00
|
9. What counters 1000 alpha maelstroms? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Electronic warfare.
- by Gypsio III - at 2012.03.24 10:47:00
|
10. Roles of Caldari ships after the ship tier change - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Zyress wrote: The future of Caldari ships is bleak. Yeah you're given them more range (that they didn't need) and a faster rate of fire instead of a kinetic bias so that they can choose their damage type(meaning there's now no excuse not to fil...
- by Gypsio III - at 2012.03.12 20:47:00
|
11. Roles of Caldari ships after the ship tier change - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I think fundamental changes to ships will be limited or non-existent. By that I mean total reworkings of ships or their bonuses. I think we're much more likely to see low-tier ships given extra slots and fittings. As such, in general, the ships wo...
- by Gypsio III - at 2012.03.12 11:47:00
|
12. torps v bcs - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
PotatoOverdose wrote: Precision torps are awesome for ships smaller than BS. You might do less nominal EFT damage, but you do way more real damage. Also, you get a MUCH longer range. Not sure whether it's potatoes or LSD, but you're certai...
- by Gypsio III - at 2012.02.28 13:56:00
|
13. torps v bcs - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Lucien Davion wrote: hi newbie here wondering if torpedoes lose out a lot on damage fired on a webbed BC? Not a huge amount. The web will take care of damage mitigation via speed, leaving damage mitigation via sig only. Torp explosion radiu...
- by Gypsio III - at 2012.02.27 13:59:00
|
14. This is why CCP should nerf the Tengu. - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
If there is a problem, it's more to do with warfare links than the Tengu.
- by Gypsio III - at 2012.02.24 15:06:00
|
15. Who the hell is flying the rokh? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Super Chair wrote: Hi. I'm a blathering caldari ****** that thinks my race only has one weapon system. Rather than train hybrids and realize how awesome they are i'm going to whine in "make naga torps" threads. *Somewhere in darkest Motsu or...
- by Gypsio III - at 2012.02.14 13:18:00
|
16. Anti-frig for fleets - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
I strongly advise against Precisions in a fleet environment. They offer only a very small applied DPS increase against their intended targets (and considerably less DPS when you're shooting anything big enough to take ~full damage), at a crippling...
- by Gypsio III - at 2011.12.05 17:37:00
|
17. Blasters or Auto cannons - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Fenmor Hayden wrote: Gypsio III wrote: Autocannons are better than blasters at being blasters. ok, I see what you mean. To explain this, I don't really mean the weapon systems alone. ACs do have considerably less raw damage than blas...
- by Gypsio III - at 2011.10.14 14:16:00
|
18. Blasters or Auto cannons - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Autocannons are better than blasters at being blasters.
- by Gypsio III - at 2011.10.08 20:01:00
|
19. Advice on defeating a Rook or a Falcon - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Originally by: Taram Caldar Damps are, frankly, pointless. No matter how low you damp him you can't get in tackle range without him getting a lock on you. Innate lock range on falcon/rook is just too long. Your objective is not to ta...
- by Gypsio III - at 2011.08.09 10:41:00
|
20. Advantages of heavy assault missiles - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
HAMs do 25% more DPS than HMs, with somewhat worse missile "tracking". HAMLs take more PG to fit, HMLs take more CPU. The worse "tracking" of HAMs, relative to HMs, is a bit of a red herring, because it rarely actually manifests itself. HAMs are ...
- by Gypsio III - at 2011.08.06 11:49:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |